Rational emotive
behaviour therapy ('REBT') views human beings as
'responsibly hedonistic' in the sense that they strive
to remain alive and to achieve some degree of happiness.
However, it also holds that humans are prone to adopting
irrational beliefs and behaviours which stand in the way
of their achieving their goals and purposes. Often,
these irrational attitudes or philosophies take the form
of extreme or dogmatic 'musts', 'shoulds', or 'oughts';
they contrast with rational and flexible desires,
wishes, preferences and wants. The presence of extreme
philosophies can make all the difference between healthy
negative emotions (such as sadness or regret or concern)
and unhealthy negative emotions (such as depression or
guilt or anxiety). For example, one person's philosophy
after experiencing a loss might take the form: "It is
unfortunate that this loss has occurred, although there
is no actual reason why it should not have occurred. It
is sad that it has happened, but it is not awful, and I
can continue to function." Another's might take the
form: "This absolutely should not have happened, and it
is horrific that it did. These circumstances are now
intolerable, and I cannot continue to function." The
first person's response is apt to lead to sadness, while
the second person may be well on their way to
depression. Most importantly of all, REBT maintains that
individuals have it within their power to change their
beliefs and philosophies profoundly, and thereby to
change radically their state of psychological health.
REBT employs three primary insights:
While external events are of undoubted influence,
psychological disturbance is largely a matter of
personal choice in the sense that individuals
consciously or unconsciously select both rational
beliefs and irrational beliefs at (B) when negative
events occur at (A)
Past history and present life conditions strongly affect
the person, but they do not, in and of themselves,
disturb the person; rather, it is the individual's
responses which disturb them, and it is again a matter
of individual choice whether to maintain the
philosophies at (B) which cause disturbance.
Modifying the philosophies at (B) requires persistence
and hard work, but it can be done.
Throughout, the counsellor may take a very directive
role, actively disputing the client's irrational
beliefs, agreeing homework assignments which help the
client to overcome their irrational beliefs, and in
general 'pushing' the client to challenge themselves and
to accept the discomfort which may accompany the change
process.
|
|